File #: 15-7716    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Code Violations Status: Passed
File created: 5/8/2015 In control: Code Compliance Hearing
On agenda: 7/29/2015 Final action: 7/29/2015
Title: Case # 15-38 1103/1105 Whitehead St of Key West Southernmost Resort Wear Yakov Blives - R/A 1103 Whitehead Street Sec. 62-2 Obstructions Sec. 14-37 Building permits; professional plans; display of permits Sec. 14-40 Permits in historic districts Florida Accessibility Code 202.4 Alterations Affecting Primary Function Areas Officer Peg Corbett Certified Service: 4-28-2015 Initial Hearing: 5-27-2015 In compliance July 22, 2015, request dismissal Count 1: A concrete ramp was poured on the city sidewalk creating a ramped entrance which obstructs the city sidewalk. Count 2: The concrete ramp was poured without benefit of a building permit. Count 3: The concrete ramp was poured without benefit of a certificate of appropriateness. Count 4: A permit was issued for interior renovations which required a 20% investment in accessibility. Once completed, an architectural barrier was left at the entrance of the door contrary to Federal ADA guidelines. There is no documented evidence of the 20% inv...

Title

Case # 15-38

1103/1105 Whitehead St of Key West

Southernmost Resort Wear

Yakov Blives - R/A

1103 Whitehead Street

Sec. 62-2 Obstructions

Sec. 14-37 Building permits; professional plans; display of permits

Sec. 14-40 Permits in historic districts

Florida Accessibility Code 202.4 Alterations Affecting Primary Function Areas

Officer Peg Corbett

Certified Service: 4-28-2015

Initial Hearing: 5-27-2015

 

In compliance July 22, 2015, request dismissal

 

Count 1:  A concrete ramp was poured on the city sidewalk creating a ramped entrance which obstructs the city sidewalk. Count 2: The concrete ramp was poured without benefit of a building permit. Count 3: The concrete ramp was poured without benefit of a certificate of appropriateness. Count 4: A permit was issued for interior renovations which required a 20% investment in accessibility. Once completed, an architectural barrier was left at the entrance of the door contrary to Federal ADA guidelines. There is no documented evidence of the 20% investment as there are interior architectural barriers as well.