File #: 16-9151    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Code Violations Status: Passed
File created: 3/2/2016 In control: Code Compliance Hearing
On agenda: 3/30/2016 Final action: 9/28/2016
Title: Case # 09-1501 Wells Fargo Bank, NA c/o Select Portfolio Servicing Choice Legal Group PA 908 Trinity Drive 4 Sec. 14-37 Building permits, professional plans, display of permits Officer Jim Young Certified Service: 7-29-2016 - Select Portfolio Servicing Certified Service: 7-28-2016 - Choice Legal Group Initial Hearing: 3-30-2016 In compliance September 20, 2016, pending fees FYI: On May 10, 2011, Planning Department received a variance request for an after the fact accessory unit which was constructed without building permits or a Certificate of Occupancy. The variance request was for building coverage, impervious surface ratio, and side and rear yard setback requirements. The variance was denied at the Planning Board Hearing of July 21, 2011. The Planning Board Resolution 2011-036 went into effect on August 2, 2011. There was no appeal to the City Commission. The construction of the accessory unit, if a permit was submitted, would not have been approved for the above reasons. This a...

Title

Case # 09-1501

Wells Fargo Bank, NA

c/o Select Portfolio Servicing

Choice Legal Group PA

908 Trinity Drive 4

Sec. 14-37 Building permits, professional plans, display of permits

Officer Jim Young

Certified Service: 7-29-2016 - Select Portfolio Servicing

Certified Service: 7-28-2016 - Choice Legal Group

Initial Hearing: 3-30-2016

 

In compliance September 20, 2016, pending fees

 

FYI: On May 10, 2011, Planning Department received a variance request for an after the fact accessory unit which was constructed without building permits or a Certificate of Occupancy. The variance request was for building coverage, impervious surface ratio, and side and rear yard setback requirements. The variance was denied at the Planning Board Hearing of July 21, 2011. The Planning Board Resolution 2011-036 went into effect on August 2, 2011. There was no appeal to the City Commission.

 

The construction of the accessory unit, if a permit was submitted, would not have been approved for the above reasons. This accessory unit must be demolished to bring this property into compliance.

 

Count 1: An exterior unit was built in the rear yard setback without benefit of a building permit and inspections. Count 2: An interior unit was built on the second floor using part of the rear open deck and a stairway was built to access this unit.